![]() The problem is that neither method seems to produce reliable results so it is impossible to say whether soft proofing could actually be used for anything else than "experimental" purposes when applied in print jobs. Don't such profiles exist at all? It appears strange to me that I need to manipulate the colors in the image and save that file – instead of choosing a profile, during the print process only, to get the file's colors optimised according to the specific paper and print hardware. If yes: Since various papers handle ink differently I would expect a profile by Hahnemühle which adjusts the ink density on print according to its paper 'PhotoRag'. Otherwise, there is no point in using soft proofing.ĭoes it mean a Soft Proof Adjustment is NOT the Affinity substitution to output an image for a specific device on print – like a specific profile of a print service is chosen on export?Īnd so profiles for print & export are entirely different from profiles for Soft Proof?Īnd, for instance this profiles for the paper "Hahnemühle PhotoRag" are meant to be used NOT for print & export but for Soft Proof only? Also, for your tests with an AP Soft Proof adjustment, the idea is to turn that on & use it as a guide to adjust the colors (via curves or whatever adjustments) so the image looks as close to what you want the print to like like as possible, & then to turn it off for the final export.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |